Casey anthony defamation trial

However, even if Anthony is able to claim any judgment from the defamation lawsuits in her bankruptcy case, she still has several non-dischargeable debts including criminal restitution, court fees and government-imposed fines and penalties. Regardless of how you personally feel about Anthony, a bankruptcy can help you if you are facing the threat of bill collectors. Contact our Washington DC and Maryland bankruptcy lawyer to learn more about whether you should file bankruptcy.

Tags: maryland bankruptcy attorney. It has not," RadarOnline. Anthony, who was infamously acquitted in 3-year-old Caylee's murder, eventually confessed to fabricating the kidnapping story claiming that she made it up out of fear.

Gonzalez argues that she suffered immensely as a result of being linked to the case through the media for several months and is subsequently taking legal action against Anthony. It would be easier for Zenaida and her legal team if the trial were to take place in Orlando, but she will respect the judge's decision," a source close to the situation told Radar.

If the trial is to remain in Orlando, and Casey is found to be libel, this would be grounds for likely appeal. Zenaida is anxious for the trial to begin in January and finally having Casey testify under oath. Zenaida just wants to clear her name," the insider added.

Judge Munyon is yet to make a ruling on the request for an alternative trial venue and the civil trial is currently scheduled to begin in Jan. Anthony, who has been in hiding since being released from jail in , spoke out publicly for the first time in June to address on-going speculation that she may have played a role in her daughter's death despite being acquitted by a jury.

She also said the hair from the trunk of the car contained a mark she had only seen in hairs from decomposing bodies—that is, hairs still in the scalp when the body started decomposing.

The DNA present in the hair shaft was also tested, but this was not DNA that can be linked to a single individual either. While hair ripped by the root can still contain nuclear DNA, the shaft of hair such as that found in the car contains only mitochondrial DNA. Unlike nuclear DNA, mitochondrial DNA does not change between generations, but is passed directly and intact from the mother to the child.

The analyst described a particular band on the hair as consistent with decomposition, but this observation is based only on her experience, and is not a proven correlation. Other interesting forensic evidence brought up included air samples taken from the car, which showed signs of gases consistent with decomposition, as well as chloroform, which is what the prosecution says Anthony used to kill her daughter.

After hearing from multiple witnesses describing an odor of decomposition in the car, the jury heard evidence from experts regarding the same odor. A trash bag was found in the trunk and ruled out by technicians as being the source of the odor recognized by witnesses; a highly trained cadaver dog alerted on the trunk, indicating that a body had been stored within; and the jury heard from Arpad Vass, a forensic anthropologist conducting research at the body farm on decomposition.

Vass performed chemical tests on air samples from the trunk, carpet samples, the spare tire cover, and scrapings from the wheel well of the car. He testified that these results indicate only decomposing remains could account for the odor in the trunk.

He also testified that there were high levels of chloroform present in the samples—an important fact to the prosecution, which claims Anthony used chloroform on her daughter before smothering her. Duct tape was found over the mouth, holding the jaw bone to the rest of the skull.

Chief medical examiner Dr. While potentially disturbing, and therefore prejudicial to a jury, Judge Perry allowed this evidence because of its importance in the case. Entomological evidence is the most accurate indication of time of death once the body has decomposed.

Judge Perry denied the motion and the defense would begin presenting their case that today. Blood might have been found from the decomposition of the remains in the trunk among the fluids released, if there was a hole in the bags the prosecution claimed the remains were wrapped in. The examiner also described the lack of conclusive DNA evidence on the duct tape found on the remains.

The trial continued with testimony from forensic pathologist Werner Spitz, author of what many consider to be the authoritative text on medicolegal death investigation.

One reason to place duct tape on the skull at that point might be to hold the jawbone on while the body is moved. That plant evidence, therefore, does not suggest the body was there for six months, as the prosecution alleges—however, it also does not exclude the possibility.

After this, a session was cancelled by Judge Perry after arguments between attorneys and a scramble on the part of the defense to produce a witness after their first two were rejected. The next session was expected to be short. This witness explained the chloroform they found in the trunk was surprising in a location like that, and that he and Vass were unable to find an explanation for its presence in the test.

As the trial continued quite a bit forensically was introduced. A chemist testified that the air samples from the car contained mostly gasoline, and that the other chemicals were not positively associated with decomposition because other natural sources exist. A forensic geologist discussed soil samples from shoes taken from the Anthony home, saying no evidence was present linking any of the shoes to the site where the remains were found—however, such soil evidence can easily fall off, so this lack means little.

A toxicologist explained that the hair mass found with the remains did not show evidence of drugs, but that it was not tested for chloroform. Still more witnesses testified about chloroform and hair samples. For more information on the forensics from the trial go here. There was some discussion of her records from work, however, which showed she was working at the time the searches were made, so it was up to the jury whether they found her testimony convincing. The motion was filed, and Perry immediately had Anthony examined by three psychologists.

He announced that, having reviewed the reports of the experts, Anthony was competent and the trial would continue.